What if a man can move up the ladder in skill and ability, but the replacement for his former position is not as enthusiastic or competent at the job as the man he is replacing? Does it speak poorly on the training abilities of the the ladder-climber? Does it reflect the difficulty of the job on new man? Should the person who moved up, move back down, and restart the whole process? Or should he maintain his new position, proud of the progress he's made, cast to naught the duties he once considered so important? Is it a prideful move, or one of quiet dignity?
I don't think I would make a very good boss. I would get bogged down thinking about this and the feelings of employees, instead of just bossing them around, which is what bosses are paid to do.
Well aware of the danger of his words,
-The0
"You know how you used to get to be on top? by being better than the guy ahead of you."
ReplyDelete"Now you know how you get on top? By being so fucking incompetent that the guy ahead of you can't do his job, he falls on his ass, and congratulations, you are now on top."
Man, I haven't seen that movie in ages. Good flick.
THANK YOU! I wanted to find a clip of the scene, but this is much better. Good job.
ReplyDeleteBut this seems to also imply more of what I am talking about, come to think of it. The boss needs his employees do do their jobs, otherwise he can't do his. It's not that the guy ahead has failed, he was caused failure.
Interesting.